Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
los angeles, california, bamboo, huntington gardens
I've been having a good debate with some friends about my alternative to universal healthcare. Two of them have raised broader philosophical questions. Rather than respond to them in that thread, which was supposed to be a debate about one specific proposal, I've chosen to respond to them in this new thread.

Here are the interesting comments leading up to the philosophical questions:

arthurdenture made a statement about values:
I value the right for sick people not to die from treatable illnesses due to unemployment more than I value your or my right to abstain from a particular government service.

I kindly told him he was wrong:
In this case, your current values are wrong. I'm hoping that I can convince you of that because you're my friend and if you have better values then you'll have a better life :)

athena328 asked why:
David, could you please explain what your values and morals are that lead you to think that Jacob's are wrong? Personally, I find my morals and values to be more in line with Jacob's (the right for people with treatable illnesses not to die because they can't pay rather than my right to abstain from government services), but maybe I don't understand your values that support your conclusions. Besides, most of Jacob's arguments seem pragmatic rather than value based.

My top values are freedom, my life, and the lives of my friends and family.

To me, freedom means being able to act without being influenced by the threat of force from other humans. Freedom is about being liberated from oppressive human forces; freedom is not about being liberated from the realities of what is needed to live on Earth.

Freedom is important because it allows us to live as humans. We're not fast, we don't have fangs, we don't have protective fur coats. The only way for a human to live is by thinking with his mind. When you restrict freedom, you restrict the mind because you limit the options available to it. You restrict the mind's abilities to find the best ways to live. When you go further and enslave a man, you shut down his mind entirely and reduce him to a tool of muscular labor.

I don't want to go in the direction of slavery and service to the government. I want to go in the direction of freedom and unrestricted intellect.

My value of freedom does not conflict with the other two values I listed: my life, and the lives of my friends and family. Freedom is the best way to achieve a good life, and a life as a slave is barely worth living.

  • 1
I mostly agree with your summary of my position, but I don't agree with your summary of Jacob's. He does not merely want to sacrifice his freedom as you said. He wants to sacrifice the freedom of everyone in America to spend their money as they wish. He wants the government to force us (at the point of a gun through taxes) to pay for the medical treatment.

Also, it's not just medical treatment for the needy as you said, but medical treatment for EVERYONE, including Bill Gates. There's a difference. We were talking about universal health care, not just some government wealth transfer from one class to another.

I get your gist though.

You're right that spending money on myself or my friends instead of donating it to strangers is a selfish act. I don't see this statement as a criticism of my values; I see it as praise!

"Would [forcing people to not be selfish] help certain people enough to be worth it to everyone?" I doubt it. But I could see someone making an argument that the survival of poor people is critical because everyone once in a while a poor person produces something great (such as the Harry Potter series). But even the Harry Potter series is only worth about 22 billion dollars. The cost of a universal healthcare system in America would dwarf that. So I doubt your argument would succeed. And when there is doubt, we should err on the side of freedom instead of the side of force and guns. People generally need to stop being so confident in the value of government programs.

If we were Zerg and we could all feel eachother's pain, digest eachother's food, and think eachother's thoughts, then yes, I might have different values. But my values are the right values for humans living on Earth. Interesting idea though!

  • 1